<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Respect Family Values &#187; Related News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com</link>
	<description>New Brunswick News and Support for Parents and their Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mandatory Sex Ed Details May Be Too Racy for Parents: Report &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/mandatory-sex-ed-details-may-be-too-racy-for-parents-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/mandatory-sex-ed-details-may-be-too-racy-for-parents-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mandatory Sex Ed Details May Be Too Racy for Parents: Report
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/mandatory-sex-ed-curriculum-new-york-city-public-schools-132404248.html?dr
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/mandatory-sex-ed-details-may-be-too-racy-for-parents-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Does Sex Ed Undermine Parental Rights?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/does-sex-ed-undermine-parental-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/does-sex-ed-undermine-parental-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/does-sex-ed-undermine-parental-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Sex Ed Undermine Parental Rights?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/opinion/does-sex-ed-undermine-parental-rights.html?_r=1
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2011/10/24/does-sex-ed-undermine-parental-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts and Sex Education for Little Kids</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/26/massachusetts-and-sex-education-for-little-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/26/massachusetts-and-sex-education-for-little-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graphic Sex Ed Class Under Fire
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/22/graphic-sex-ed-class/?test=latestnews
Massachusetts town opts for unlimited, free condoms for all children, starting in elementary school
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/06/sixyear-olds-can-now-get-free-unlimited-condoms-in-massachusetts-town.html
Public school sex ed gone wild: condoms for 1st graders; stuffed animal sex
http://www.jillstanek.com/public-school-sex-ed-on-sex-st.html
Update:
Good news: Mass. school now may limit condoms to, um, fifth-graders and older
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/25/good-news-mass-school-now-will-limit-condoms-to-um-fifth-graders-and-older/
Massachusetts town to rethink school condom policy
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GHU94O1&#38;show_article=1
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/26/massachusetts-and-sex-education-for-little-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa and Planned Parenthood Co-ed Sex Education</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/25/iowa-and-planned-parenthood-co-ed-sex-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/25/iowa-and-planned-parenthood-co-ed-sex-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents Outraged at Planned Parenthood Class Teaching Sexual Positions
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jun/10062407.html
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/06/25/iowa-and-planned-parenthood-co-ed-sex-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstinence Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/05/28/abstinence-advocate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/05/28/abstinence-advocate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bristol Palin’s Solo Act
http://www.harpersbazaar.com/magazine/feature-articles/bristol-palin-interview-0610
Bristol Palin: The Photo Shoot
http://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/fashion-articles/bristol-palin-pictures-0610
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/05/28/abstinence-advocate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ontario backs off sex-ed changes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/23/ontario-backs-off-sex-ed-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/23/ontario-backs-off-sex-ed-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ontario backs off sex-ed changes
Controversial curriculum came &#8216;out of nowhere&#8217; for parents
http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/article/1027001
LONDON, Ont. &#8211; Complaints over a sex-ed curriculum for Ontario elementary schools with lessons about same-sex marriage, masturbation and oral sex at various grade levels saw the province beat a hasty retreat yesterday, vowing to consult parents and rework the program.
The curriculum, which was to be implemented in the fall, was quietly posted on a government website months ago but blew up publicly Tuesday when Premier Dalton McGuinty confirmed the details.
While McGuinty stood behind the program initially he conceded yesterday that the government went too far and didn&#8217;t consult widely enough.
&#8220;We spent a good 24 to 48 hours now listening to parents, our caucus, and parents through our caucus, who have responded, and it&#8217;s become pretty obvious we should give this a serious rethink,&#8221; McGuinty said after an unrelated event in this southwestern Ontario city.
&#8220;I know that parents are in fact supportive of the idea that children should be taught about their body parts, their relationships and those kinds of things, but they are obviously not comfortable with the proposal that we put forward, so we&#8217;re going to improve upon that.&#8221;
The government, McGuinty added, will &#8220;create more opportunities for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/23/ontario-backs-off-sex-ed-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teachers Shouldn&#8217;t Be Put in this Position</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/teachers-shouldnt-be-put-in-this-position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/teachers-shouldnt-be-put-in-this-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sex Education Could Mean Charges for Teachers
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,590520,00.html?test=latestnews
“A Wisconsin prosecutor is warning sex education teachers they could face charges if they follow a new state law that allows them to instruct students about proper contraceptive use…”
“The new law, which took effect March 11, lays out requirements for those that do, including teaching the benefits of abstinence, criminal penalties for having underage sex and the benefits and proper use of contraceptives…”
Edited to add:
Wisconsin D.A. Warns Schools: Sex Ed Liable to Promote Delinquency of Minors
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040708.html
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/teachers-shouldnt-be-put-in-this-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bristol Palin On Good Morning America</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/bristol-palin-on-good-morning-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/bristol-palin-on-good-morning-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/bristol-palin-on-good-morning-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wisconsin D.A. Warns Schools: Sex Ed Liable to Promote Delinquency of Minors&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/wisconsin-d-a-warns-schools-sex-ed-liable-to-promote-delinquency-of-minors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/wisconsin-d-a-warns-schools-sex-ed-liable-to-promote-delinquency-of-minors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wisconsin D.A. Warns Schools: Sex Ed Liable to Promote Delinquency of Minors
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040708.html
JUNEAU COUNTY, Wisconsin, April 7, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) &#8211; Teachers implementing a new law that requires explicit, pro-contraceptive sex education in public schools may risk criminal prosecution for promoting the delinquency of minors, a local district attorney warned Juneau County schools last month.
In a letter to school districts March 24, Juneau County District Attorney Scott Southworth urged school administrators to withdraw from the human growth and development courses altogether, rather than submit to the new mandate requiring children to be taught how properly to use condoms and other contraceptives. 
&#8220;To adopt the highly-controversial mandates of Act 134 risks the safety of our children and the careers of our teachers &#8211; something I implore you not to do,&#8221; he said.
Southworth characterized the new law as &#8220;requiring that you transform your current human growth and development curricula into programming that promotes the sexualization &#8211; and sexual assault &#8211; of our children.&#8221;
Both of the representatives of Juneau County, State Senator Dale Schultz and State Representative Ed Brooks, had voted against the new mandates.
The D.A. warned that the new law promotes the sexual assault of children, exposes teachers to possible criminal liability, undermines parental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/07/wisconsin-d-a-warns-schools-sex-ed-liable-to-promote-delinquency-of-minors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Toyota 52 deaths, Gardasil 49. Toyota recalled.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/06/toyota-52-deaths-gardasil-49-toyota-recalled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/06/toyota-52-deaths-gardasil-49-toyota-recalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Related News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota 52 deaths, Gardasil 49. Toyota recalled.
http://www.jillstanek.com/by-barbara-hollingsworth-of-th.html
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.respectfamilyvalues.com/2010/04/06/toyota-52-deaths-gardasil-49-toyota-recalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

